When 'Fair' is Fatal: Succession Lessons from the Bodmann Case.
In an earlier article, I shared why naming multiple decision makers can complicate an estate. A recent case, Estate of Bodmann, provides a perfect “Part 2” specifically for business owners.
In this case, a father named all seven of his children as co-executors.
He likely thought he was being fair by giving everyone a seat at the table. Instead, he unintentionally triggered a decade of litigation that crippled the family business.
While the family fought over who was in charge, the business revenue plummeted from over $100,000 to just $25,000.
The Bodmann case shows that a business cannot survive a leadership gap. Succession planning is essential, and naming multiple “leaders” in the hope they will sort it out is not a strategy.
Purported Authority vs Legal Authority: While entitlement was being battled out, one son began acting as “CEO” and making aggressive demands before the court officially appointed him.
The court eventually disqualified him, ruling that his pre appointment conduct which caused carriers to refuse to deal with him, constituted “mismanagement”.
Acting before authority is granted can create serious consequences. But waiting for the court to step in, can be just as costly.
The Cost of Friction: Hostility between family members isn’t just a personal issue; it’s a business liability. Internal friction can cause vendors, carriers, and clients to jump ship while the family is still arguing about who gets to sign the checks.
The “Fairness” Fallacy: Trying to “be fair” by naming everyone often leads to no one being able to lead. This results in the destruction of the very asset you intended to leave behind.
Designing for Continuity: If you own a business, your estate plan needs to be more than just a Will. Proper succession planning involves:
- Entity Structuring: Ensure that your plan contains detailed instructions for operations and specific purchase options for the individuals who will actually run the business.
- Professional Fiduciaries: Even cooperative families can fracture under business pressure. A neutral third party can prevent internal politics from disrupting operations.
- Clear Interim Leadership: Establishing who has the authority to manage day-to-day operations the moment you are gone, that is, before a court steps in.
The goal is not fairness. The goal is continuity.
Without a designated leader, the business is left waiting for someone to sit in the chair. By then, the value is often gone.